In this article, we try to answer to two questions. The first one is "What is the meaning and the consequences of the absence of esoteric experience in the works of Rumi?" In answering this question, firstly we explain the notion of "the absence of esoteric experiences". Then after a short examination of this notion in the works of Muslim and Christian mystics, in the middle ages, we discuss the Rumi`s point of view about and his approach to the esoteric experiences and in the next step, we talk about the consequences of his view and his approach to this notion. These approaches are humiliating the esoteric experiences, silence and finally pointing to them implicitly. In the last section of the article, we reach the second question: how we can say that Rumi is a mystic despite the absence of esoteric experiences in his works? We discuss five viewpoints concerning mysticism including those of Turner, McGinn, Underhill and Russell, based of which Rumi could be recognized as a mystic.
Kakayi, Q., & Bahrani, A. (2009). The Absence of Esoteric Experiences in the Works of Rumi and the Problem of the Definition of Mysticism. Religions and Mysticism, 41(1), 117-140.
MLA
Qasem Kakayi; Ashkan Bahrani. "The Absence of Esoteric Experiences in the Works of Rumi and the Problem of the Definition of Mysticism", Religions and Mysticism, 41, 1, 2009, 117-140.
HARVARD
Kakayi, Q., Bahrani, A. (2009). 'The Absence of Esoteric Experiences in the Works of Rumi and the Problem of the Definition of Mysticism', Religions and Mysticism, 41(1), pp. 117-140.
VANCOUVER
Kakayi, Q., Bahrani, A. The Absence of Esoteric Experiences in the Works of Rumi and the Problem of the Definition of Mysticism. Religions and Mysticism, 2009; 41(1): 117-140.
)