Epistemological Foundations of Wolterstorff’s View on the Rationality of Religious Belief

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Tehran University

Abstract

One of the approaches which defends the rationality of religious beliefs is the reformed epistemology. Among reformed epistemologists, Wolterstorff’s view is subject to less criticism. This article tries to present epistemological foundations of Wolterstorff’s view by describing and analyzing the statements which he has offered in his works. Wolterstorff’s epistemological foundations are explainable, totally, in the light of evidentialism. To turn away deficient and radical enlightenment epistemology, Wolterstorff approves deontological epistemology beside situated rationality With regard to extended conception of rationality, Wolterstorff not only approves situated rationality and epistemological aspect but also resorts to psychology of belief. However He asserts foundationalism beside coherence, according to approve negative coherence, foundationalism doesn’t affect his affirmative view. Wolterstorff examines the rationality of religious beliefs with regard to variety aspects but he supports some pluralism.
 

Keywords


1 [اکبری، رضا (1386). ایمان‌گروی. چ دوم، قم، پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی.
]2[ پلنتینگا، آلوین؛ ولترستورف، نیکلاس (1381/1983). عقل و ایمان، ترجمه: بهناز صفری میان‌رشیدی، قم، اشراق.
]3[ کلارک، کلی جیمز (1388/1956). بازگشت به عقل، ترجمه: عباس یزدانی، زنجان، دانشگاه زنجان.
[4] Buras, Todd (2011). “The Other Wolterstorff-- A Review Essay”. Christian Scholar's Review, vol 41, Dec, Winter, p.77, http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/book-reviews/71325213/other-wolterstorff- review-essay. (آخرین دسترسی آخر سال 91).
[5] Davison, Scott A. (2011). “Nicholas Wolterstorff: Practices of Belief: selected essays, Vol. 2 (Terence Cuneo,   ed.)”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, New York, Cambridge University Press, Vol 70, Dec, pp 255–258, http://link.springer.com/search?query=10.1007%2Fs11153-011-9287-4./DOI:10.1007/s11153-011-9287-4. (95/3/31).
[6] Plantinga, Alvin (2000). Warranted Christian Belief.  New York, Oxford University Press, Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, http://home.sogang.ac.kr/sites/sgphilobk21/%EC%9E%90%EB%A3%8C%EC%8B%A4/Lists/b8/Attachments/3/warranted_christian_belief_alvin_plantinga.pdf (95/03/24&95/03/25).
[8] Wolterstorff, Nicholas (2010). Inquiring About God. Terence Cuneo (ed.), Vol. 1, New York: Cambridge University Press, http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=0050E10CC7DC2F0E2E4BE2927C7D3BB4     (95/03/24&95/03/25) http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9780511676239.     (95/03/24&95/03/25). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676239 (95/03/24&95/03/25).
[9] ---------- (1996). John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. New York, Cambridge University Press, http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=BFE3A40528180901600E6EE915A4A94A  (95/03/24&95/03/25).
[10] ---------- (1995). Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks. New York, Cambridge University Press, http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=E24F19B30A9B29BE014A83DCACF481EA  (95/03/24&95/03/25).
[11] ---------- (1983?). “Can Belief in God Be Rational If It Has No Foundations?”. Alvin Plantinga; Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.), 2004, Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=7ED5122EF82ECC2F8D8F792F853FC199 (95/03/24&95/03/25).
[13] Yazdani, Abbas (2010). Evidentialism and The Rationality of Religious Belief. Saarbrüchen, LAPLAMBERT Academic Publishing.